Ed Eldred is a Democrat running for a seat on the NC Court of Appeals. As an appellate lawyer, Eldred has handled hundreds of appeals, is a board-certified specialist in child welfare law, and often represents parents in DSS court.
Democrats currently hold 4 of the 15 seats on the NC Court of Appeals. This year, three seats are on the ballot. We spoke to Eldred about his judicial philosophy and what he wished reporters would ask him.
What does the North Carolina Court of Appeals do?
The Court of Appeals corrects legal errors made in trial courts. Are your readers still reading or did I put them to sleep at line one? If they’re still awake, they should know about 90% of all cases in North Carolina end in the Court of Appeals. It is essentially our court of last resort. It catches mistakes.
What can you share about your judicial philosophy to help readers understand how you might approach important issues that come before the court?
Until the US Supreme Court told us otherwise, I always thought equal justice under law was the bedrock of any judicial philosophy. It is, after all, inscribed right there on their building. So that’s where I start–no one is above the law–and I build from there. I don’t want a philosophy built on sand.
If justices are obligated to impartially decide cases, why does it matter if people vote for a Democratic versus Republican candidate?
What do you wish reporters asked you? Why?
I heard someone say that if you care about education, you must vote for Democratic judges. Why?
(We ask every candidate this question) If you could design a pair of Crocs for yourself, what would they look like?
Why shouldn’t judges take an extreme position?
We want our judges to be the voices of reason. Extremism is a manifestation of our base instincts, and reason is not one of those. This is not hard stuff.